|
2007 Contest Information
The John Cotton Dana Award, sponsored by H. W. Wilson, honors outstanding
library public relations, such as the promotion of a summer reading
program, a year-long centennial celebration, fundraising for a new college
library, an awareness campaign or an innovative partnership in the
community.
You May Enter
The contest is open to all libraries, agencies and associations which
promote library service. Exceptions are institutions represented by John
Cotton Dana Award judges (Friends groups, foundations, staff associations
and branch/member libraries) and organizational units of the American
Library Association and H.W. Wilson.
Information for Applicants
Please read these rules carefully.
For additional help, see the JCD Tip Sheet.
Entries
Each entry must include two (2) copies of the following items (please do
not include duplicate copy of the entire entry binder):
-
The Official Application Form, with the
original signed by the Library Director
-
A concise summary of the project (100 words or less)
-
A concise description of the project, including needs assessment,
planning, implementation and evaluation phases. (No more than four [4]
pages, no smaller than 10 point typeface.)
-
One copy of the above items should be stapled together so that it can be
pulled from the entry for use by the judges.
Entries for the 2007 Contest must reflect one of the following time frames:
-
Calendar year 2006 (January - December)
-
School year 2005-2006 (Fall-Spring)
-
Special project which ends in 2006
Entry forms are available from the American Library
Association and H.W. Wilson (click here to
download). Judges reserve the right to disqualify incomplete
entries.
Format
The entry should consist of a sturdy binder or presentation book (should
not exceed 12" wide by 18" high by 3" thick.) It may include:
-
Selected photographs/promotional materials
-
A 1/2" videocassette, no longer than 10 minutes
-
A 3-1/2" diskette including clear and complete directions for use.
This must be supplemented by appropriate print and/or audiovisual versions.
Multimedia formats, including web sites and other digital media, may be
submitted along with documentation citing what effect the materials had
and what happened as a result.
Organization
The entry should be organized with tabbed sections supporting each of the
criteria for judging:
-
Needs Assessment
-
Planning
-
Implementation
-
Evaluation
For each section, appropriate selected samples of planning documents,
research, media releases, media coverage received and other documentation
and supporting materials should be included so that the judges can
evaluate the content of the public relations activity.
Deadline
Entries must be received by December 8, 2006
Copyright and Publication Permissions
The John Cotton Dana Awards encourage creativity in library public
relations. Applicants should be aware, however, that when using
trademarked or copyright material, permission must be sought and included
with the entry. Entries without such permission will be disqualified.
By submitting an entry, applicants agree to have their programs considered
for publication and grant the American Library Association and H.W. Wilson
full rights to publicize entries selected for publication, including
reproduction of selected sample illustrations and video clips.
Winners
All entrants will be invited to attend a special John Cotton Dana Awards
Tea sponsored by H.W. Wilson at the American Library Association Annual
Conference, where the winners will be honored.
If you are a winner, you must create a poster depicting your entry for
display at Annual Conference and/or the Web pages of the American Library
Association and H.W. Wilson.
Judging Information
The judges will evaluate the success of the public relations campaign
based on the following four criteria:
Needs assessment (15%)
What process or method was used to determine the need for the public
relations program in the first place? Include a brief description of the
community served.
-
needs assessment
-
community profiling
-
other research
The judges look for an organized focus or research which provides an
opportunity on which to build an effective public relations program.
Planning (15%)
The public relations plan:
-
Specify the target audience(s) including community partners
-
List the goals
-
State measurable objectives
-
Determine public relations strategies and communication tools
-
Present the budget
The judges look for careful planning and organization with a focus on
outcomes (achieving the measurable objectives). They also look for how the
planning involved other parts of the library and other segments of the
organization or community.
Implementation (35%)
How was the plan implemented? What techniques, activities, materials and
resources were used to meet the goals and objectives? What print and
electronic media were used? How did outside organizations and individuals
participate? What graphics were used?
The judges correlate the implementation to the planning. They also look
for competent execution of the plans, levels of participation, unified and
consistent graphics and effective use of media.
Evaluation (15%)
The evaluation phase is the most overlooked element in any public
relations program and is dependent on having measurable objectives in the
planning stage. The judges consider evaluation very carefully. They look
for a purposeful review of the program in the light of the following
questions:
-
Did the program meet its goals and measurable objectives? (List
measurements that support the achievement of the program.)
-
What were the successful elements of the plan and the results?
-
What change, if any, took place in the target audience?
-
What, if any, difficulties were encountered and how were they handled?
-
Did the program point out any changes that could be made to improve the
library's public relations?
Additional judging criteria include:
Overall creativity (15%)
Originality and creativity of the public relations program are considered
here.
Presentation (5%)
This refers to the entry itself. The judges look for all the required
elements (see Application section) presented in an easy-to-follow
attractive manner.
Judges' Responsibilities
The judges may disqualify entries that do not conform to the entry
instructions. Decisions of the judges are final. Judges will maintain
confidentiality and will not discuss entries until the official
announcement of the winners at the Midwinter press conference. All
applicants will be notified of the disposition of their entry. All
applicants are welcome to contact the Chair of the JCD Committee to
ascertain the strengths and weaknesses of their applications.
Mailing Directions
Send materials in one package to:
John Cotton Dana Library PR Awards
ALA/LAMA
50 E. Huron St.
Chicago, IL 60611
Be sure that each separate item in the package is labeled with the name of
the applicant. Applicants should retain copies of printed materials,
clippings and duplicates of audiovisual materials for their own records.
Neither the JCD Committee nor the American Library Association is
responsible for materials lost or damaged in transit and/or during the
judging process. Applicants who submit unique items do so at their own
risk and are advised to insure their entries if the contents cannot be
replaced or replicated.
All entries must reach the American Library Association by
December 8, 2006.
Note: It is each library's responsibility to secure all necessary
permissions for its entry.
John Cotton Dana Award Entry Checklist
Disposition of Entries
Entries selected for a John Cotton Dana Award will be retained for viewing
at the American Library Association Annual Conference. Other entries will
be returned after the judging. Winning entries are housed at the American
Library Association Headquarters Library for two years and circulated upon
request. Standard ALA interlibrary loan forms are used. The borrowing
library must pay shipping both ways. Entries will be shipped UPS Ground,
return receipt requested.
Contact:
Interlibrary Loan, American Library Association
50 E. Huron St.
Chicago, IL 60611
800/545-2433, ext. 2153
John Cotton Dana Library Public Relations Awards 2006 Contest Judges:
-
Tim Wadham, Maricopa County Library District (Chair)
-
Denis Cunningham, Halifax Public Library
-
Marsha Iverson, King County Library System
-
Nancy Magnuson, Goucher College
-
Patricia Ann Marvel, Las Vegas-Clark County Library
-
Amy Shaw, Southwest Public Libraries
-
Sherrill Smith, Public Libraries of Saginaw
-
Mary Ann Tricarico, Emmanual College Library
-
Michele Russo, Indiana University-South Bend Library
-
Judith Gibbons, Kentucky Department of Libraries and
Archives
The 2007 Contest Judges will be announced.
ALA Representative:
Lorraine Olley
Executive Director
Library Administration and Management Association
American Library Association
50 East Huron Street
Chicago, IL 60611-2795
Tel: 800-545-2433, x5036
Fax: 312-280-5033
Email:
lolley@ala.org
|